That’s why we have no peace negotiations, and the refusal even of a cease fire the only possible outcome devised by the Straussian neocon psychos who run US foreign policy is unconditional Russian surrender. Russia has been forced to fight against a neighbor and kin that it simply can’t afford to lose and as a nuclear and hypersonic power, it won’t.Įven if Moscow will be somewhat strategically weakened, whatever the outcome, it’s the US – in the view of Chinese scholars – that may have committed its greatest strategic blunder since the establishment of the Empire: turning the Ukraine Project into an existential conflict, and committing the entire Empire and all its vassals to a Total War against Russia. The Ukraine Project as an existential conflict One third of Syria remains US-occupied – even as the US lost its proxy war against Damascus due to Russian intervention. Iraq is trying to do it for years now, with no success. Yet the golden rule still has not been met: if a vassal state wants to be treated as a sovereign state, the first thing to do is to shut down key branches of the Empire of Bases and expel US troops. German businessmen, off the record, are sure that sooner or later Berlin may defy Washington and do business with the Russia-China strategic partnership because it benefits Germany. The problem, once again, is that vassal states don’t have the authority or power to comply with any agreement ensuring peace. In parallel, China could offer peace treaties to Japan, South Korea and the Philippines, and subsequently a significant part of the US Empire of Bases might vanish. That would assure security for any participating nation and relieve pressure on it from Washington.īets could be made that the most relevant European powers might accept it, but certainly not Poland – the hyena of Europe – and the Baltic chihuahuas. And they are envious, painfully envious and jealous.”Ī credible path ahead is that Moscow will not negotiate with NATO – a mere Pentagon add-on – but offer individual European nations a security pact with Russia that would make their need to belong to NATO redundant. As military analyst Andrei Martyanov has relentlessly stressed, “NATO ‘planning’ is a joke. Translation: it’s NATO as a whole that is completely losing credibility, as its humiliation in the Ukraine battlefield is now painfully graphic for all the Global Majority to see.Īdditionally, “donor fatigue” means losing a major war, badly. The new spin is that it’s “strategic insanity” for Washington to expect to defeat Moscow, and that NATO is experiencing “donor fatigue” as the sweatshirt warmonger in Kiev “loses credibility”. Russia, applying the rudiments of realpolitik. Meanwhile, a smatter of Atlanticist foreign policy analysts are now busy trying to change the narrative on NATO vs. The geopolitical chessboard is in perpetual shift – and never more than in our current incandescent juncture.Ī fascinating consensus in discussions among Chinese scholars – including those part of the Asian and American diasporas – is that not only Germany/EU lost Russia, perhaps irretrievably, but China gained Russia, with an economy highly complementary to China’s own and with solid ties with the Global South/Global Majority that can benefit and aid Beijing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |